- The site is attractive and unclear
- The page looks composed and communicates nothing. Visitors cannot tell what is offered, who it is for, or why this organization rather than another.
- Templates were designed before the content
- Content was written to fill a template that was designed before anyone knew what the page had to say. Sections exist because the layout has a slot for them.
- There is no system, only screens
- Every page was designed on its own. Type, spacing, buttons, and components vary by launch date, and the site reads as several sites wearing the same logo.
- Mobile was an adaptation, not a decision
- The mobile experience is the desktop layout compressed. Hierarchy collapses, navigation becomes a list of everything, and the next step disappears below the fold.
- Accessibility was left to the build
- Contrast, focus states, target sizes, and reading order were never considered, so accessibility becomes a remediation project against a system that resists it.
- Conversion was designed as pressure
- Every section ends in the same request for a demo. Nothing accounts for the visitor who is still deciding whether this category of solution applies to them.